Worse than Tories

UK and Germany back a sustainable ceasefire

So why can’t the United States?

David Cameron is the foreign minister of the United Kingdom. Yes, the same Prime Minister who led Britain into its largest foreign policy debacle since the colonial era.

I disagree with David Cameron on most issues. He was a horrible Prime Minister but is right in calling for a ceasefire.

This leads to where the United States political sphere is so far right wing on foreign relations that we struggle to support Ukraine with enough aid for them to win the war. Our Presidents have consistently thrown Ukraine under the bus, first with the Budapest Memorandum in 1994, which forced Ukraine to give up weapons without the same being done by Russia. In 2012, when Romney rightfully declared Russia as our most important geopolitical foe, Obama incorrectly claimed Romney was living in the past. This was 4 years after the invasion of Georgia, 20 YEARS after the Chechen War, and obviously wishful thinking by President Obama. Obama told Putin directly that Ukraine was not a strategic priority. We threw them under the bus further with the Minsk Agreement, which led to a ceasefire without a total victory for Ukraine.

Not to say European leaders have been perfect. Angela Merkel was the primary reason why Ukraine and Georgia were denied NATO membership in 2008.

The stances of Obama, Merkel, Hollande, and Biden on Ukraine have consistently been weak and have bred a major human rights catastrophe. McCain and Romney might have had horrible tastes in vice presidential candidates and horrible domestic policy proposals, but they were correct regarding their views on Putin.

Biden has consistently gone with the line not to “provoke” Russia. He has denied the long-range missiles to Ukraine which would give Ukraine the tools necessary to defeat Russia and get back Crimea, all while sending Israel more than they ask for.

Ukraine uses the few long-range missiles European nations have given them to blow up warships.

Israel uses long-range missiles to blow up hospitals, schools, and apartments.

The two countries have nothing in common.

Israel is more corrupt, less democratic, and less free than Ukraine. Ukraine does not have millions of stateless people living within its effective borders who are regularly harassed, tortured, and murdered by their occupiers.

Ukraine is a natural ally of the United States.

They couldn’t be more different.

Damn the rankings of Israel; go with how they rank the Occupied Palestinian Territories, which are de facto under Israeli control. That is the true ranking of Israel. Palestine/Israel is ranked lower than Afghanistan on the World Press Freedom Index. If one were to give North Korean leaders their own separate ranking, it would also soar up in the rankings. Israel and Palestine should be combined in human rights rankings.

Russian escalation of wars on their borders violates the sovereignty of Ukraine and Georgia. Biden and Obama’s timidness in their European relations is the root cause of this war.

The right policy is this:

  • Deescalate from Israel now. Force Israel to recognize Palestinian sovereignty or give Israeli citizenship to all Palestinians.
  • Send Ukraine every weapon we can to ensure they can win their freedom. As soon as they win, grant them immediate NATO membership.
  • End visa requirements for European Union citizens. End ESTA.
  • This idea that America is an island and the isolationist strain in our politics is fundamentally wrong on both a morality level and construes a deep misunderstanding of both foreign relations and economics.

I made a spreadsheet of 63 of the worst wars and genocides in the history of the world. Wars and Genocides If you sort the list by casualties per year, World War II was the most deadly conflict in the history of the world at 12.2 million per year, not including the Holocaust. The Great Leap Forward was the deadliest democide in the history of the world, with 11.25 million killed per year. The third deadliest conflict in history by casualties per year was the Holodomor, with 7.5 million people killed in only one year. World War I came in 4th place with 5 million per year. 5th place is the Rwandan genocide of 1994, which killed 1.2 million people over 3 months, or 4.7 million per year.

The Holodomor was among the deadliest conflicts in the history of the world.

Russia will do it again if given the chance.

Russia can never rule Ukraine again.

Slava Ukraine.

Read this Foreign Policy Article for more information: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/07/11/obama-russia-ukraine-war-putin-2014-crimea-georgia-biden/

Why the Western Balkans haven’t joined the European Union

A response to How the EU Failed the Western Balkans by TLDR News.

The reason the Western Balkans have not joined the European Union is simple: the remaining Western Balkan states have not finished closing their accession chapters to join the European Union.

If we use the Democracy Index, Montenegro, Albania, and Macedonia all had scores under 6 until 2021. Bosnia still has a democracy score under 6. Croatia, Romania, and Bulgaria were to join because they met the acquis, and their democracy scores were well over 6. A country can’t have a democracy score under 6 and meet all the acquis to join the European Union.

Joining the European Union is not as simple as paying a fee to enter a nightclub and then entering. The European Union is far more than just a military alliance like NATO. It is a complex international organization collaborating across every possible realm of political and economic regulation, which is far more than just a zone for free travel. A lot of decisions the European Union makes require unanimity between members. I personally believe this is a weakness of the European Union, and the bar should be brought down to a 2/3 majority, so if one Hungary abstains from a decision every other country agrees on that, they are unable to block the entire bloc. We have seen with Brexit that leaving the European Union just because you don’t like anti-money laundering laws is a foolish decision, and if there is a problem with a law, you need to use your words and reasoning to block it.

Because of the nature of how the European Union works and the vast number of laws that are made across every aspect of life, it makes sense for joining the European Union to have a high bar; we do not want the European Union to look like Mercosur (for example), where member states are getting suspended but instead for membership to be forever. Keep membership in NATO relatively easy to get with a lower bar, but European Union membership needs to remain restricted to countries with the highest stability level.

Country Submitted Accession / Length of accession Years
Kosovo Kosovo[20] 14 December 2022 [21]Applicant 425 1.16
Moldova Moldova 3 March 2022 [16] Negotiating 711 1.95
Georgia (country) Georgia 3 March 2022 [17]Candidate 711 1.95
Ukraine Ukraine 28 February 2022 [16] Negotiating 714 1.96
Finland Finland 18 March 1992 1 January 1995 1019 2.79
Sweden Sweden 1 July 1991 1 January 1995 1280 3.51
Austria Austria 17 July 1989 1 January 1995 1994 5.46
Greece Greece 12 June 1975 1 January 1981 2030 5.56
Denmark Denmark 11 May 1967 1 January 1973 2062 5.65
Republic of Ireland Ireland 11 May 1967 1 January 1973 2062 5.65
United Kingdom United Kingdom 10 May 1967 1 January 1973 2063 5.65
Slovenia Slovenia 10 June 1996 1 May 2004 2882 7.90
Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina 15 February 2016 [16] Candidate 2919 8.00
Czech Republic Czech Republic 17 January 1996 1 May 2004 3027 8.29
Lithuania Lithuania 8 December 1995 1 May 2004 3067 8.40
Estonia Estonia 24 November 1995 1 May 2004 3081 8.44
Spain Spain 28 June 1977 1 January 1986 3109 8.52
Latvia Latvia 13 September 1995 1 May 2004 3153 8.64
Portugal Portugal 28 March 1977 1 January 1986 3201 8.77
Slovakia Slovakia 27 June 1995 1 May 2004 3231 8.85
Poland Poland 5 April 1994 1 May 2004 3679 10.08
Hungary Hungary 31 March 1994 1 May 2004 3684 10.09
Croatia Croatia 21 February 2003 1 July 2013 3783 10.36
Bulgaria Bulgaria 14 December 1995 1 January 2007 4036 11.06
Romania Romania 22 June 1995 1 January 2007 4211 11.54
Malta Malta 16 July 1990 1 May 2004 5038 13.80
Cyprus Cyprus 3 July 1990 1 May 2004 5051 13.84
Serbia Serbia 22 December 2009 [21]Negotiating 5165 14.15
Albania Albania 28 April 2009 [15]Negotiating 5403 14.80
Montenegro Montenegro 15 December 2008 [21]Negotiating 5537 15.17
North Macedonia North Macedonia[G] 22 March 2004 [15]Negotiating 7266 19.91
Turkey Turkey 14 April 1987 [31][32][21]Frozen negotiations 13453 36.86

As we can see, the time for countries to join the European Union ranges from 2 years in Finland, which is an exceptional case, as we can classically see in every social and economic development metric. Romania and Bulgaria are just at the cusp of being predicted on whether they are good candidates for Schengen membership in the regressions I have run.

The current candidates in the Balkans score around the same level as Romania and Bulgaria on the Corruption Perceptions Index. While they want the Balkans to join the European Union, European leaders are also wary of letting countries join when these systemic problems exist. They must deal with these problems before European Union membership is possible.

The freedom of the press in these countries is in line with other Eastern European member states of the European Union. There is little work to be done there to close the chapters. They all score better than Israel, for example. There is good reason to be optimistic of them joining in the future.

There is no appetite to join the European Union in Iceland and Norway; they already have the benefits of Schengen, and there is no desire for deeper integration with the bloc. Russia and Belarus obviously cannot join, and Turkey meets the mark on basically none of the acquis. The Swiss are already Schengen members and do not wish to join further. Microstates of Monaco, Liechtenstein, San Marino, and Vatican City already have freedom of movement. Vatican City cannot join because it is an authoritarian regime. The only remaining potential candidates are already candidates, and the annual reports on their accession status make it very clear which hurdles need to be cleared before they can join. The only country in Europe that could join quickly at this point and has the appetite for it is the United Kingdom.

Once we look at this, I don’t believe there is any appetite for future expansion of the bloc. Croatia joined the Schengen Area only one year ago. Romania and Bulgaria will partially join Schengen on March 31st, and they are expected to fully join Schengen this year or next year once they convince the Austrians to stop stonewalling their accession.

 

There is no appetite for future expansion from Iceland and Norway; they already have the benefits of Schengen, and there is no desire to have deeper integration with the bloc. Russia and Belarus obviously cannot join, and Turkey meets the mark on basically none of the acquis. The Swiss are already Schengen members and do not wish to join further. Microstates of Monaco, Liechtenstein, San Marino, and Vatican City already have freedom of movement. Vatican City cannot join because it is an authoritarian regime. The only remaining potential candidates are already candidates, and the annual reports on their accession status make it very clear which hurdles need to be cleared before they can join. The only country that could join quickly at this point and has the appetite for it is the United Kingdom.

I want all of the Western Balkans to join the European Union. But for that to happen, they need to meet all of the acquis to join. My advice to them is to look at where they made progress in the components of the Economist’s Democracy Index and work on reforming the areas where their scores are not as high as those of European Union members. As these reforms are made, petition the European Union to analyze their progress and close chapters one by one as these improvements happen. Montenegro, which currently has the highest democracy score of the Balkan states that have not accomplished membership yet, should go to the European Union and work on negotiating to close the acquis chapters. They can talk directly to the governments of existing European Union member states and get support from member states. Much progress has been made in Montenegro in the last few years. For that, the European Union should continue the good process to ensure that all countries that join the bloc meet the requirements to ensure successful integration and continued stability of the bloc. According to the European Union, there are still chapters in each candidate country that require further preparation. Improving these areas through domestic legislation is the proven way to accomplish European Union membership. Internal reform is the necessary next step to EU membership. There are no shortcuts to membership, and there should not be any shortcuts to membership.

Once the chapters are closed, they can focus on lingering disputes with their neighbors with European Union membership while lobbying other European Union member states, particularly Germany and France, to lobby on their behalf towards EU enlargement. Trying to get the support of Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria, and Greece before closing the acquis chapters is premature.

It is clear what the future holds. The remaining Balkan states need to meet the acquis, and they will join the European Union.

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index

What I want

I want a world where everyone in the world has the opportunity to succeed in life, where the only barrier is themselves. I understand this is a long way to go, but there are specific policies we can do to improve lives around the world.

Social policy

  • Reinstate work visas for low-income work.
  • End private prisons.
  • Protect LGBT rights.
  • Black Lives Matter. Defund the police.
  • Legalize abortion (jfc I’m so angry I have to write this down)

Economic policy

  • Debt-free college
  • Nationalize the railways
  • Reduce consolidation of big businesses. If a big bank fails, divide them up, don’t just give all of their assets to one other bigger bank, making that bank even larger.
  • It needs to be easy to start a business.
  • Reduce regulations that make building new rail in this country nearly impossible. We have many regulations which do not improve safety and hurt the environment.
  • Expand food stamps
  • Make retirement more secure by fully analyzing OASI. OASI will not survive with our changing demographics in the future. Millennials need retirement security, and OASI will not work in 40 years.
  • Every American needs health insurance, be it public or private. We spend way too much on health care. Create real public options. Health savings accounts are wonderful, there needs to be two public options, one which is an LDHP and another which is an HDHP with an HSA option.
  • Public-private partnerships are usually shams, waste taxpayer money, and underperform.

Foreign policy

  • Ukraine must win. Arm them to the teeth and push Russia out of the country.
  • Ceasefire in Gaza. Netanyahu is out of line and needs to be removed from power. He has now killed his citizens because of his hatred for Muslims. https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/world/two-israeli-hostages-killed-eight-injured-in-israeli-strikes-on-gaza-hamas
  • Ukraine and Georgia need NATO Membership.
  • Putin needs to be removed from power. He is a threat to world stability. The only way this is possible is with a bullet. This is a trolley problem.
  • End all visas between OECD members.
  • Expand the OECD to include more democracies.

Also, regarding Israel killing its citizens in Gaza. Murdering Jews in cold blood is considered anti-semitic where I come from.

 

All of this is why, while I will vote for Biden over Trump, I don’t think either candidate is good. Biden is a bad candidate, he is just better than Trump.

More on the genocide in Palestine

Every day when I scroll on Instagram I see pictures from the American Friends Service Committee and the UU Service Committee streaming out of Gaza of children getting blown up by American bombs being shot by the Israelis.

 

I also see the same thing from Russians blowing up Ukrainian grandmothers.

 

Why is it that you can send money to Israel, which is killing children, while you struggle to send weapons to Ukraine, which was invaded by a vicious fascist dictatorship? You make me wish we had ranked voting so I could vote you out.

 

My great-grandmother did not flee Nazi Germany so that her descendants could watch our country send weapons to a country which is killing children as we practically stand idly by as the Russians invade a sovereign country. Not only that but as Ukrainians watch their grandmothers be murdered by Russian pigs you have the audacity to ask them not to blow up military installations in Russia. The nerve.

 

I know you wish you could close off our borders to foreigners, put up steep tariffs, and just subsidize every business with tax money. The reality is this will not work. The United States has a moral obligation to stand up for human rights in Afghanistan, Palestine, and Ukraine. Ukraine has made their demands very clear. They want to be members of NATO to protect themselves. We owe them that after the brutality they have undergone.

 

I am sick and tired of you sending weapons to Israel which then go to blow up hospitals, murder children at point blank range, and then you have the nerve to defund the UNRWA, one of the only agencies which actually helps civilians in Gaza. This is because of unsubstantiated claims a few members are involved with Hamas. Remove the people helping Hamas, and continue to provide aid to the Palestinians in Gaza. This is not complicated. This is what every human rights organization in the world is calling on you to do.

 

For comaprison, a bunch of United States State Department staffers granted visas to the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. Are you going to defund the State Department? Defunding an entire humanitarian agency because a few staffers violated the law is absurd.

 

Your policies in Afghanistan and Palestine are pure evil. Your policies in Ukraine are almost as bad as how Neville Chamberlain responded to the Anschluss. Your border policy without pushing for fixing our work visa laws which George W. Bush broke is inhumane.

 

Your commitment to human rights is as bad as Bush and Trump. I wish we had ranked voting so I could vote against you this November, but everything you do which I oppose is just as bad as George W. Bush and Trump. There are a few issues where you are still better than them on domestic issues, but I pray to God that your caucus will be slaughtered in the primaries.

 

Under your leadership we live in a world where right wing extremists like Netanyahu and Putin are more emboldened than at any other point in my lifetime. It is only a matter of time until another terrorist attack strikes either India, the European Union, or the United States and the terrorists will be funded once again by people in Saudi Arabia (according to your friend Hillary Clinton) and other Gulf States, and they are being trained in Afghanistan right now. This is your legacy.

 

If Ukraine falls, NATO will look weak, and Taiwan will be invaded. The United States has the resources to give Ukraine total victory. I don’t know if we have the resources to wage a three front war in Europe, Korea, and Taiwan. That is the future if Ukraine does not have total victory.

 

We tried appeasement with Putin in 2014. People said that giving him Crimea, the Donbass, and Luhansk would be enough and that he wouldn’t continue. People said the same thing when the Anschluss happened. These ideas were fully discredited in 1939 and have no place in politics. It is utterly absurd that these views still have an ear in modern politics.

 

Please consult with human rights organizations. Your foreign policy stinks. There is still time to turn this ship around.

 

Cut off all non-humanitarian aid to Israel. Either recognize Palestine as a foreign country and get them UN membership or demand Israeli citizenship for all Palestinians. This Bantustan-like system in the region is not working.

 

Give Ukraine everything they need to stop the Russian invasion to both save Ukrainian lives. We cannot afford a World War.

US Greenhouse gas emissions breakdown

We need to stop climate change. I feel like everyone knows this.

The easiest, cheapest, and fastest way to do this is through a carbon tax, even before accounting for the double dividend.

But why? Why can’t we regulate our way out of climate change without carbon pricing?


Source: EPA

Transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions. The largest source is from light-duty vehicles. So around 15% of total US emissions come from light-duty vehicles, AKA personal vehicles. We need to reduce the need to drive and increase the use of carbon neutral  transportation. We need more trains everywhere. We need to nationalize our rails and increase public transportation as we build dense walkable neighborhoods. Most trips are short, and can be replaced by more sustainable modes of transportation. As we build these substitutes, a carbon tax will increase the cost of burning fossil fuels while the dividend puts money in people’s pockets which will help them buy renewable vehicles if they live somewhere where mass transit is insufficient.

https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/fast-facts-transportation-greenhouse-gas-emissions
Source: EPA

Electricity is the second largest emitter. Individuals cannot personal responsibility our way out of reducing emissions from generating electricity. While subsidies help in constructing new electricity generation, any reduction in existing emissions, which is the priority, will be filtered through the substitution effect, significantly reducing the efficiency of subsidies to bring coal plants offline.

Make a deadline to turn systems off? I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they pass by.

The only realistic way is to charge people and companies every time we burn fossil fuels.

The same logic for the electricity production problem applies to industry. I fear subsidies will increase output more than reduce emissions. There’s a 50% chance I am right on this prediction. Depends on the margins.

Commercial and residential is from things like natural gas heating our homes. We can ban natural gas and propane in new homes. The carbon tax will deal with already existing installations of natural gas and heating.

The carbon tax will also deal with agriculture emissions.

We need a carbon tax.

Biden is the world’s easiest fiddle

“He also said he believed that Hamas may have mounted its attack on Oct. 7 to disrupt American efforts to establish normal diplomatic relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, a project many believe would have transformed the region but could have undercut the urgency of the Palestinian cause.”
Biden is correct. The timing of October 7th was absolutely perfect. It successfully prevented aid to Ukraine from the US for 4 months and counting. It ended impeachment efforts against Netanyahu, who remains the biggest barrier to peace in the Levant. It prevented Israeli normalization with Saudi Arabia, which might have led to Palestinian autonomy and an actual two-state or one-state solution, which would inevitably lead to respect for the rights of Palestinians and the end of settlements. If Palestine gets some recognition and the Palestinians get the rights they deserve under international law, Hamas will lose power. Iran’s entire schtick would fall apart with this development. It could not have been better timed for Netanyahu, Hamas, the Ayatollah, and Putin.
Both Netanyahu and Hamas know exactly what they are doing. They are both parasites. If there is no terrorist threat, Likud loses power. If Likud loses power and Palestinians are granted basic human rights, Hamas loses power. If the United States stops writing blank checks and Likud needs to negotiate and give Palestinians basic human rights, both Likud and Hamas will lose power. The blank checks from the United States prevent human rights for Palestinians, which strengthens Hamas, which keeps Likud in power. One cannot exist without the other. They are in the most disgusting, codependent relationship I have seen in my lifetime.
We need to stop writing blank checks for Likud from our taxes and force Israel to respect the rights of Palestinians. Then Hamas loses their entire argument, and Israelis and Palestinians are both safe.
To be clear, this is fundamentally different from the Anschluss in Ukraine. The only solution there is to fund the Ukrainian military and drive the Russian beasts out of Ukraine, and the minute the last Russian troll leaves Ukraine, grant immediate NATO membership to Ukraine at a minimum. Not giving Ukraine aid empowers Putin. Putin is a fascist, and Russian elections are shams. He will not negotiate.
Biden is being played like a fiddle and is starting to realize it.
The only question now is… what will we do about it to put peace talks back on track? More guns is not the answer in Israel.

2024 could have been a landslide

Trump cannot get a majority in polls in Texas against Biden. Neither is losing bad enough to give a shot to a legitimate third party, but it does show that the current status quo of both parties is not enough to command a lead.

People don’t love Biden, and people don’t love Trump. They have small bases.

We must consider what type of candidate or campaign would win a large majority. Neither Biden nor Trump is that candidate.

The issue dominating the headlines is inflation because we had a spike last year. Here is the inflation graph since November 2018.

As you can see, inflation spiked to over 8% in 2022. This is the fault of spendthrift socialists like Biden, according to Faux News. We need to stop giving handouts to poor people and instead give tax cuts to hard-working billionaires.

But I lied slightly because that graph is not of the United States. This graph is of Canada. Here is what inflation looked like in the United States over the same period.

Notice how similar the graphs are? Our inflation episode is from a source bigger than the US or Canada. Inflation has been global and is bigger than what the President can control. I don’t blame Biden directly for the inflation, which started as soon as the invasion of Ukraine began.

If we look at the President’s approval rating, however, it doesn’t track inflation. Source: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/joe-biden/

President Biden had a positive approval rating until the Afghanistan withdrawal and has remained negative ever since. Being the second President to lose a war in history put him under, and there has been no major victory to bring him back to positive approval. The victories he has had since he failed in Afghanistan, after clearly stating that he did not believe the Taliban would take over, show a poor choice in foreign policy and military advisors on his part, and he has no one to blame but himself for selecting such unqualified individuals. Still, his attempts to broadcast the good things he has done have been too small to matter, and he has failed to remind Americans they even happened. Biden is a bad politician.

Having a negative approval in the first term is not unheard of either. Bill Clinton was unpopular in his first term, and then got more popular in his second term. Source: https://news.gallup.com/interactives/507569/presidential-job-approval-center.aspx

Biden can win if he sees a major victory, such as Ukraine regaining its territory or a treaty signed in Palestine recognizing their rights. Since he gets so horny over the two-state solution, the Biden administration needs to recognize the Palestinian Authority or seek other solutions. It is unlikely anything will pass through Congress, but he can still leverage power through diplomacy. Biden got into his situation through a foreign policy blunder. He can start to recover by leveraging a foreign policy victory.

Here are a few ideas on how Biden can win:

  • Pass an aid package to give Ukraine the support they need to win the war by the Fall. This is half of the reason why Republicans refuse to pass a Ukraine aid bill.
  • Pressure Israel to sanction Russia.
  • Pressure Israel to resolve the situation in Gaza to protect civilian lives and stop sending them blank checks.
  • If Israel continues to be a money laundromat for Russian oligarchs and continues their genocide in Gaza, we need to sanction them heavily.
  • Negotiate an agreement with the European Union to reinstate mutual visa-free travel between our regions on the path to a customs-free zone encompassing all of the Arctic except Russia.
  • Lower tensions with China and pressure them to sanction North Korea.
  • If Putin loses the Ukraine War and there is a revolution in Russia, support the democratic activists so Russia can change.
  • Campaign on a carbon tax and dividend. Such a policy would provide direct cash payments to families, offsetting inflation, which is now down to around 3%.
  • Campaign on streamlining regulations to approve the construction of transit to save money.

There are a few pressing issues that are harder to deal with politically. The most obvious of these to me is the cost of housing. It is a simple supply and demand problem, but getting cities to build housing as fast as our population grows and people want to move to new places is a major challenge. There are a few ways the President can push cities to be more urbanist, namely giving lip service, but short of streamlining regulations so we can build transit more efficiently and ending Buy America requirements, there is little the President can do to impact housing costs and improve transit around the country.

Biden supports AMTRAK, but by not supporting the full nationalization of railroads, most of the improvements will be limited to the Northeast Corridor. This is not horrendous but falls far short of what we need.

Biden is seriously out of touch with reality on most foreign policy issues. I fear he always has been.

The most absurd thing about Biden’s entire campaign is that his website, joebiden.com, doesn’t even have an issues page. Come on, man, this is embarrassing!

The candidate I want is someone who does the following:

  • Can do basic campaigning goddammit. Announce your victories loud and clear, make it clear where you stand, and stand by your values jesusfuckingchristthisissosimpleicantevenrightnow.
  • Stands up to bullies domestically and abroad. This means treating Republicans, Netanyahu, and Putin equally with derision and all the respect they deserve, which is none.
  • Campaign on a carbon fee and dividend to solve climate change.
  • Opposes genocide in Gaza.
  • Supports Ukraine.
  • Is not a mercantilist.

The thing is, I like a lot of Biden’s domestic policies, from what I can remember because he doesn’t make his stances clear on his website jesusfuckingchristhowdidweelectthisguytothewhitehouseinthefirstplace. But if you don’t campaign on them, even if the majority of Americans agree with you, it does not matter.

But when it comes down to it, he is not Trump, even though Trump and Biden agree on most economic issues, immigration, and almost every foreign policy issue. Please prove me wrong, Joe. Send enough aid to Ukraine to drive the Russian horde out of Ukraine. Biden’s social values are fundamentally different from Trump’s. Trump opposes abortion rights. Biden supports abortion rights.

Biden is an institutionalist. Trump wants to upend our system.

Suppose you decide that the disasters in Ukraine, Afghanistan, and Palestine are so egregious that you cannot vote for Biden. Honestly, I do not blame you. But there are many other races on the ballot this year that you do need to vote for. You need to vote in your House of Representatives election for the Democrat. Vote in the primary for the progressive who opposes Netanyahu and Putin. Ensure that if your state has a Senate election, you vote for the Democrat to prevent a Republican trifecta.

While we could do so much better than Biden, you should still vote for him despite his disastrous foreign policy. His foreign policy decisions are largely the same decisions Trump would make. But when it comes to preserving our imperfect yet functional system of government Biden offers a  path to the future. Trump repeatedly says that he won’t accept election results if he loses. His court appointments are responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade. They are coming for other rights in time. CNN

There are far too many issues where Biden and Trump agree with each other while disagreeing with the American people. But there are many issues where they differ, and unfortunately, until we reform our election system and replace the Electoral College with a functional election system or elect a progressive as President, many of these issues will continue to be dominated by loud voices with lots of money contrary to what the majority of people and basic morality dictate.

Electing Trump will not get more progressives elected. If it could, Biden would not be President. The fact that Biden is President disproves accelerationism—it’s time to do what works. Vote Progressive in every primary and Democratic in the general. New Democrats are highly flawed, but they are equally better than Republicans. This is the path to electing more Progressives.

Get ranked voting everywhere. It doesn’t guarantee progressives will win, but it makes it more likely that progressive candidates can run against moderate Democrats. We need to run in every primary, everywhere, every time. We lose 100% of the races we don’t run in.

Get involved in local politics, electing people of strong moral fiber to your city, county, and state governments. If you want to have people with values in line with the majority of Americans elected who represent our values. The most common background of members of the House are previously serving in the state legislature and lobbying or activism. 44 Senators have previous experience as Representatives in the US House. 16 previously served in state Houses, 27 previously served in State Senates. 61 Senators have served in the US House or their state legislature. The other Senators are mostly former governors, state attorneys general, lieutenant governors, and mayors. The only non-appointed Democrats who did not have previous elected experience were Mark Kelly, Jon Ossoff, Raphael Warnock, and Elizabeth Warren. All of whom are exceptional individuals.

Support policies like mandatory vacation as a right and true visa-free travel. The more people who travel abroad, the more people who have face-to-face interactions with people from other countries, and the more likely we are to have politicians and voters who understand issues beyond our borders. Interact with people from other countries and talk about politics. The United States is the most powerful country in the world. In our increasingly interconnected world, face-to-face interactions outside social media only become more important. As travel barriers continue to increase, the ability of radical extremists to push for policies like supporting genocidal regimes becomes more possible. Travel is the path to peace.

That is the only realistic path to getting people involved in politics with strong moral fiber and a good understanding of global politics. You can study international relations, I believe you should to an extent, but nothing can substitute the power of a good trip visiting places and people while interacting with locals. Learn about our world, and elect people with these qualities to your local and state governments.

2024 will be historic

Over the last 236 years, there has only been one time when a political party has won the popular vote for the Presidency 5 times in a row.

It occurred during the New Deal and World War II era under Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman.

A party has won the popular vote for the Presidency 4 times in a row three times in history.

  • The first time was during the Civil War and Reconstruction eras. The Republican Party won the popular vote under the tickets of Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and Samuel Tilden from 1860 to 1872. Samuel Tilden lost the Electoral College but won the popular vote.
  • The second time this occurred was when the Republicans won every election from 1896 through 1908 under McKinley, Roosevelt, and Taft.
  • The Democrats have won the popular vote in the last four elections under Obama, Clinton, and Biden. If President Biden wins this year, and I hope he does, this will be the third time in American history that a party wins the popular vote five times in a row. This is the only streak in American history where a party has won the popular vote four times in a row while losing the Electoral College during their streak.

We will see if we make history in November and tie Roosevelt and Truman for the longest streak of a party winning the popular vote in American history.

An impossible definition about enclaves

So it starts with a video about Kaliningrad and how 79% of voters voted to leave Russia. It was a small turnout for the poll, but nonetheless, I believe this is important.

This leads me to look it up on wikipedia where it is called a semi-exclave.

I am a geography nerd, but this surprised me that it wouldn’t be seen simply as an exclave.

Quick definition roundup:

  • Enclave: Completely surrounded by one other territory
  • Exclave: Physically detached from the rest of its territory
  • Semi-enclave: Would be fully contained by another except for a sea border to international waters.
  • Pene-exclave: a piece of territory which borders another territory by land, and is connected to the rest of its territory by only water.
  • Pene-enclave: The only way in or out except by ship is through one other country.

Then we run into an interesting definition on the Wikipedia page, List of enclaves and exclaves:

Therefore, Vinokurov applies a quantitative principle: the land boundary must be longer than the coastline.

This definition is interesting, and then we can go measure the land boundary of every exclave in the world. But the problem becomes when we measure the length of the coastline. Coastlines are fractals, and the length of any fractal is infinity. If we accept this definition, there cannot be any semi-exclaves in the world. The definition is completely non-nonsensical.

So we must disregard this, and come up with a more reasonable definition:

Semi-enclaves definition still works, a territory that borders only one other territory and international water. There are five obvious contenders at the national level:

  • Brunei
  • Gambia
  • Monaco
  • Portugal
  • Ireland

Canada used to follow this definition until they drew a land border with Denmark on Hans Island.

I think we should however remove the idea of a semi-exclave. Every country counting as a semi-exclave is an exclave.

I propose a better definition: an exclave is any territory where one cannot draw a continuous line back to the capitol of the territory without leaving that territory. The capital cannot be an exclave. If they are connected via the national EEZ, then the territory in question is not an exclave.

There is such a thing as a practical exclave, such as Point Roberts, Washington, but one can travel between Point Roberts and Bellingham via a boat while staying in American territory, so it is not an exclave.

For this, we can rewrite the list using this more robust definition:

Exclaves which are not enclaves:

  • Cabinda, Angola
  • Kaliningrad, Russia
  • Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea
  • French Guiana, France

Enclaves that are also exclaves: (fully surrounded by the territory of another country, even if part of it is a maritime border, you need to cross the sovereignty of another country before you reach international waters)

  • Gibraltar

Semi-enclaves that are also exclaves: (no maritime connection to home country, only one land border with one other territory at the same level)

  • Kokkina/Erenkoy, Cyprus/Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
  • Oecusse, East Timor
  • Musandam, Oman
  • Melilla, Spain
  • Alaska, USA

Semi-enclaves that are also pene-exclaves: (usually means you can get back to the capital while staying in domestic waters)

  • Temburong District, Brunei
  • Ras Doumera, Eritrea
  • Ceuta, Spain
  • Point Roberts, Washington
  • St. Regis-Quebec
  • Campobello Island, New Brunswick
  • Magallanes Region, Chile
  • Tornio, Finland

Pene-exclaves which are not enclaves:

  • Dubrovnik-Neretva County, Croatia

Pene-enclaves which are also exclaves:

  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon, France

These definitions make a lot more sense to me and are a lot more descriptive. Sovereignty of course does not end at the coast, and countries have every right to forbid the transit of specific goods across their maritime territory. For that reason, I believe Gibraltar is an enclave despite bordering the Strait of Gibraltar, given how it is completely surrounded by Spanish territory.

Saint Pierre and Miquelon is an interesting case. It has no land connection to Canada, but there is a ferry. There is no direct flight back to France. While one could take a boat to France and never enter Canadian territory, there is no reason to do so. For all practical purposes, Saint Pierre and Miquelon is an enclave of Canada for travelers, so it deserves its own category. I believe Saint-Pierre and Miquelon is the only place in the world like this, where not only is every convenient way back to the capital city through one other country, but is also a true exclave.

 

Hope this makes sense.

Federal law is supreme

We are once again seeing a litigation on whether states can infringe on Federal law. This is a very simple case, really, and the Supreme Court will almost certainly find that states may not violate federal law. agreeing with the Fifth Circuit. I will be surprised if the Supreme Court even hears the case, given over 200 years of precedent in this country, that Federal Law trumps State Law.

First of all, The Fifth Circuit states

(a) Under Article III, a plaintiff must have standing to sue. This
bedrock constitutional requirement has its roots in the separation of
powers. So the threshold question here is whether the States have
standing to maintain this suit. Based on this Court’s precedents and
longstanding historical practice, the answer is no.
(b) There are good reasons why federal courts have not traditionally
entertained lawsuits of this kind.

United States et al. v. Texas et al. 2022

In other words, states do not have the authority to obstruct federal law enforcement. If federal law enforcement runs afoul of the law, the harmed parties have the right to sue the federal government.

But a state does not have the right to obstruct federal law enforcement simply because they do not like what the federal government is doing.

This is the law.

Every Supreme Court justice, including every Supreme Court justice appointed by Donald Trump agreed with this long-standing finding. Only Alito dissented.

The current efforts by Greg Abbott and the rest of the Republican Party of Texas which controls the state government to obstruct federal law enforcement by building razor wire in the Rio Grande is another violation of Federal law by obstructing federal law enforcement. The Supreme Court will almost certainly hold the long standing finding that states do not have the authority to violate federal law. If State officials continue to violate federal law they can be arrested.

On top of this, state legislatures are not independent and the Federal government is supreme. Independent State Legislature Theory is a rebranding of an idea that the Federal courts, regardless of what party appointed the majority of the bench, has consistently ruled as unconstitutional.

Texas needs to get into line and follow the law. Immigration is the sole responsibility of the Federal government.