2020 Senate Elections, part 1

I’ll get this off my chest… this year’s Senate elections were the biggest electoral disappointment of my life. Massive epidemic, a historic recession, and the Democrats seriously under performed up and down the ballot.

The Senate election odds and polling were both favoring a Democratic win, and that fizzled out completely. https://bookies.com/news/senate-races-odds-tracker

Democrats were expected to pick up Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Maine, and North Carolina (although Iowa’s odds flipped late in the election as it started to become clear the Democrats had very little steam), which brought them from a projected 50/50 majority (along with the Vice Presidency) to a Senate in peril.

The odds for both races in Georgia currently favor the Republicans to keep their 15 year hold on the Senate seats from Georgia.

This year’s election is likely going to be the first time since 1968 where a new President was elected without their party also taking or maintaining control of the Senate.

We must also remember that the last Democratic Senators from Georgia were very conservative as well.

Don’t misunderstand me, I am very grateful for the work Stacey Abrams and so many others are doing in Georgia which has made the state competitive, and everyone who wants to make a difference should do what they can to help the election of two Democrats in Georgia. We would have to defeat two incumbent Republicans to get a Democratic Senate. David Perdue was elected with 52.9% of the vote in 2014.

We must understand the odds currently favor Republicans in every way.

I want people to not be surprised in January when the Republicans will most likely keep control of the Senate. After the massive under performance outside of Georgia, we should avoid getting their hopes too high.

If the most likely outcome happens this year, we need to not lose hope and keep in mind that there are significant pick ups to be made in 2022 in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Iowa. Those three seats will give the Democrats a narrow majority.

But it is impossible for me to overstate how important it was this year for Democrats to win in both Iowa and Maine, and what a massive loss those two races are for our country.

I do not want this to be misconstrued as understating the amazing work which is being done in Georgia. Stacey Abrams and all of the other activists are an incredible force for good for this country, and they made an incredible difference already. the fact that they made the race against David Perdue competitive, when he won with 7 points more than his opponent 6 years ago is nothing short of incredible. They turned multiple solid Republican races into highly competitive races, almost out of the blue.

But we shouldn’t underestimate the deep cultural forces they are pushing against right now in the heart of the South, and keep in mind that in two years there are going to be several races where we could perform extremely well with the right candidates which will likely give the Democratic Party control of the Senate. That is where I am placing my hopes.

2020 Presidential election analysis

The 2020 Presidential election is finally over. Joe Biden is going to be the first New Democrat President since Bill Clinton.

This post will have 4 main parts, the first will look at how Joe Biden did compared to his predecessors over the last 30 years,  the second part will look at individual state results and how they have evolved to give Joe Biden the victory, the third part will look at nationwide exit poll data for 2004, 2008, 2016, and this year, and the conclusion part will ask how 2024 looks based on these trends and what an election without Trump might look like, and what sorts of strategies will likely work based on historical results.

Overall

In the 1992 and 1996 elections Bill Clinton won very narrow margins twice. He won only 43% of the vote in 1992 and 49.2% of the vote in 1996. Bill Clinton covered a number of southern states in both elections, which no Democrat has managed to do since.

In 2000 Al Gore almost won by a very narrow margin which of course many believe was stolen from him in the famous Bush v. Gore decision which stopped counting ballots before they finished. He carried the Midwest, but he lost Ohio and Florida giving Bush a very narrow win. He won the popular vote.

In 2004 George W. Bush won a majority of the popular vote, and picked up New Mexico and Iowa giving him a total of 286 electoral college votes.

President Obama became the first Democratic President since Jimmy Carter to win a majority of the popular vote, and won 365 electoral college votes. He ran a campaign focused on reforming health care and getting money out of politics. He carried the largest trifecta with more seats in the Senate than any time since 1976, the largest majority in the House since 1936, a majority of State governorships,This is the and a majority of State legislatures. Democrats gained trifectas in Wisconsin, New York, and Delaware.

The 2012 election continued to see Obama pull over 50% of the vote, expanding his campaign to be unabashadly pro-gay marriage and announcing how he supports free community college. Democrats won more votes for congress, but due to gerrymandering Republicans retained their majority from 2010.

In 2016 Hillary Clinton lost very narrow margins in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. She was the first Democrat to lose Michigan since Michael Dukakis in 1988, and the first Democrat to lose Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan in 1984. Republicans won slightly more votes for the House.

This year in 2020 Joe Biden became the first New Democrat to ever win a majority of the popular vote. He lost seats in the House from his caucus at the same time.

Incoming Presidents have lost seats in the House from their party in 2020, 2016, 2000, 1992,  and 1960.

Incoming Presidents have gained seats in the House from their party in 2008, 1980, 1976, and 1968.

There appears to be no correlation between a new President being elected and gaining or losing seats in congress. 1980 saw the largest gains for an incoming President with 34 new seats for Republicans, although no majority. 2008 saw the largest gain for an incoming President along with a majority in their party, with 21 new seats which provided 257 seats.

Over the last 92 years, there have  been Republican trifectas elected in 1928, 1930, 1952, 2002, 2004, and 2016. There have been Democratic trifectas in 1932, 1934, 1936, 1938, 1940, 1942, 1944, 1948, 1960, 1962, 1964, 1966, 1976, 1978, 1992, and 2008. We have had far more Democratic trifectas than Republican trifectas in recent American history.

One flaw with this simplistic type of analysis is that before 1994 there were a lot of Southern Democrats in the Democratic Party who were very different from Northern Democrats. Newt Gingrich defeated a lot of moderate Democrats which has ended up with the two parties having less overlap today than they used to.

The deeper finding in this data is what made 2008 different from every other year since the post-1994 realignment. I find there are two things different from 2008 as opposed to every other election since Gingrich’s contract with America.

  1. Our Presidential candidate was not from the New Democrat Coalition, and focused on a message of hope and change.
  2. The Democratic Party under the leadership of Howard Dean fully embraced a 50 state strategy which led to gains at every level of government.

The Democratic Party has not run a candidate who is not from the New Democratic Coalition along with the 50 state strategy in any other year since the realignment of 1994.

When you take into account the fact that the Democratic party was a lot more ideologically pure in 2008 it makes 2008 even more remarkable than a simple party count will do. After a few switches we had 60 seats (given two Independents who caucus with Democrats) which is enough to overcome a filibuster. This is the only time this has happened without a large number of Northern Republicans being required to override a filibuster.

There have only been three major gains for the Democratic Party in the House since 1994, those occurred in 2006, 2008, and 2018. Democrats had the largest gain of seats in Congress during a Presidential election year since Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 2008. It is the first of only two times in the last 30 years where the Democrats did not run a New Democrat. The other time was President Obama’s reelection.

Individual States

*when I use the word “significant” I mean that it brought the candidate over 50% support in a demographic.

Arizona

Biden pulled his most impressive win in Arizona by far.  He was only the second Democrat to win Arizona since 1948. when Harry Truman was the last President to win it by over 50 points. Bill Clinton won a small majority in Arizona in 1996. The Democrats also performed extremely well in the Senate. This is going to be the first time the Democrats have controlled both seats in Arizona since 1953 when Ernest McFarland lost his seat. We also took over the State Senate and are only one seat behind in the State House. I will do a deeper analysis on which seats we won and lost in the State legislature in its own post.

It looks like President-elect Biden won the Hispanic vote by 63%, he won voters under the age of 30, and he won a majority of the vote in cities, particularly for people of color. Biden also won the white college graduate vote.

This strongly indicates that Democrats need to really focus on increasing ballot access for voters in cities if we are to win future elections. We should focus on getting out the vote on college campuses.

Florida

Florida was missed even though the polls expected Biden to win it. During the same night, Florida voted for a $15 minimum wage with a 2/3 majority as well.

Biden won the Black vote, Hispanic/Latino vote, voters under the age of 30, the college graduate vote, the city vote. Gender and whether you have a college degree was not a significant factor for turnout. Trump did better among noncollege graduates than college graduates, but not significantly. Trump won the Cuban vote which makes 6% of the population with 56% of the vote, just like he did in 2016.

Similar indicators for Arizona, Democrats need to make sure people of color in cities can vote easily.

We need to do everything we can to preserve no excuse mail in voting in Florida.

Georgia

This was the first time Georgia voted for a Democrat since 1992. What really made the difference was the incredible work Stacy Abrams did in getting out the vote in key Democratic demographics, primarily African Americans.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, African American and Hispanic voters, college graduates, families who make under $50,000 a year, and won a majority in Atlanta and Atlanta suburbs. Gender did not make a significant impact to the election, except among Latinos. Latino men voted for Trump, Latino women voted for Biden. There also were more Latino women voting than Latino men. College education did not make a significant impact, but Biden did do a lot better among people with a college degree.

Michigan

Michigan has voted for Democrats every year (except 2016) over the last 30 years.

Kerry, Gore, and Clinton all got around 51% of the vote.

President Obama got 54% and 57% of the vote, and Gretchen Whitmer got 53% of the vote.

New Democrats had their best performance in Michigan of 51% against Dole and Bush. Bill and Hillary Clinton failed to pass the 50% threshold in 1992 and 2016. They campaigned differently from Obama. President Biden is only barely scraping past the 50% mark, and he is about to become the first New Democrat to ever win a majority of the vote in Michigan, by just a hair.

Joe Biden is on track to win Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia with less than a majority after a recession and epidemic which the sitting President has not helped us recover from. These 5 states carry 63 electoral college votes.President Obama and Gretchen Whitmer offered very daring visions for the United States and direct solutions to the problems people faced in this state Democrats must win in order to win. Clinton and Biden ran more lukewarm campaigns which didn’t focus on the same issues Obama focused on and got lukewarm results.

Jimmy Carter is the only Democratic president in the last 70 years to win the Presidency and not win Michigan.

With all of this being said, we need to understand where we picked up voters in this critical state.

Biden won younger voters, people of color, families who make less than $50,000 per year, union voters, city voters, Wayne county and Southeast MIchigan, and white college graduates. Gender did not make a significant impact when controlling for race, although Biden did poll better with women. Women had better turnout then men.

Get out the vote on college campuses and to low income neighborhoods in Greater Detroit and Democrats will win Michigan in 2022 and 2024.

Biden flipped White college graduates as opposed to 2016. We must retain the White college graduate vote in future elections.

Given the core of the Democratic party, this should be easy. Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan came closer to winning the high school vote than Clinton did, but did significantly better than  both Clinton or Biden with voters who have some college or an Associates Degree.

Also, I do not believe that it was simply the issue of lead pipes in Flint, Michigan for her success. Thousands of U.S. Areas have issues with lead in their pipes, and those states continue to elect Republicans who do nothing. Whitmer won because of her campaigning style, moving Michigan from giving 58% of their vote to Snyder in 2010 to 53% of their vote to Whitmer in 2018.

If the Democratic Party is wise, they will learn from her success and replicate it.

Nevada

Similar to Michigan, President Obama appears like he will continue to be the only Democrat to win over 50% of the vote in Nevada since 1964.

I expect it is for the same reason.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, college graduates, suburb voters, Washoe county (Reno), nonwhite voters. Gender did not make a significant difference when controlling for race except among Latino voters. Biden tied Trump among White college graduates and lost White noncollege graduates.

Ohio

Joe Biden is the first Democratic President to lose Ohio since John F. Kennedy in 1960. Ohio has voted for the winner of the Electoral college in every Presidential election since 1900 except for in in 2020, 1960, 1944. It will likely continue  to be a bellwether in the future.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, college graduates, low income households, cities with over 50k people, and white college graduates, and people of color. Gender did not make a significant difference although Biden did poll better among women.

If we get out the vote in big cities we can win Ohio in 2024.

Pennsylvania

Al Gore and John Kerry just barely passed the 50% margin in Pennsylvania, and Obama won Pennsylvania by 52% in 2012 nonwhite people.and 54% in 2008. Bill and Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden failed to pass 50% of the vote in this state.

Biden won voters under the age of 45, college graduates, people who make under $50,000 per year, people in big cities. Gender did not make a significant difference controlling for race, although Biden did poll significantly better among white women who were more likely to turn out to vote. Biden won white college graduates.

Wisconsin

Barack Obama’s campaign was the only Presidential campaign since 1964 to win over 50% of the vote in Wisconsin. He did it twice.

Biden won the college graduate vote, people who make under $50,000 a year, cities with over 50k people. Wisconsin is unique among swing states in that gender made a significant difference among white people with Biden winning the vote of 52% of white women. He won white college graduates and people of color.

Nationwide exit poll data

Vote by Education:

Year No High School HS Graduate Some College College Graduate Post Grad
2004 0.5 0.47 0.46 0.46 0.55
2008 0.63 0.52 0.51 0.5 0.58
2012 0.64 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.55
2016 0.46 0.43 0.49 0.58
2020 0.48 0.52 0.51 0.62

Obama won such margins because his policies appealed to High School Graduates.

The only three successful Democratic Presidents to successfully pull voters from Republicans were Carter in 1976, Clinton both times, and Obama in 2008.


Obama’s platform was the first Democratic platform to capture voters whose family income is above $75k. This is probably due to the recession, given that Biden also managed to pull voters who make between $50k and $100k. This is also likely because Obama lost these voters in 2012 but still commanded 63% of voters who make under $30k and 57% of voters who make between 30k and 49k.

Obama’s platform was the only modern candidate to get a majority of the vote from people who only have a high school graduate.  People with only a high school education often vote for the winner of presidential elections, so we need to make sure that our platform appeals to them and win that demographic by at least 50%. People with some college have played kingmaker in all of the last 5 Presidential elections, and President Obama won them twice.

Let’s learn from our successes and not replicate our failures.

Going Forward

Given the results of this election night, the biggest most important rule of the elections going forward if not just in general for the rest of time is this…

Do NOT speak out against progressive initiatives which have won at the ballot box in swing states

This should be extremely obvious to anyone with any experience working in politics.

It took a recession with unemployment peaking over 10% and a literal epidemic under a Republican President to elect a New Democrat in the modern era. Even with that incredibly favorable situation, Joe Biden is on track to win Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Georgia with less than a majority after a recession and epidemic which the sitting President has not helped us recover from. These 5 states carry 63 electoral college votes, and if they had flipped to Trump, Biden would have lost. 3 of those states worth 36 electoral college votes which have a total of do not have Republican Trifectas, which brought Biden down to only 270 if they had flipped to Trump.

If we want to win in swing states we need to do a deep autopsy of the campaign messaging of Barack Obama and ensure that whoever we run in 2024 will have similar messaging which works in critical swing states and carry significant benefits in down ballot races for state legislatures and congresses.

I absolutely do not think that we are seeing losses in these states “because of Donald Trump”. Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are getting similar results to other New Democrats we have run in swing states. From this comparison of how New Democrats and Obama performed my conclusion is simple.

Moderate messaging does not work as well in swing states as opposed to a strong progressive platform focusing on health care, eliminating corruption, and free community college. Progressive messaging provides overwhelming wins for the Presidency which leads to historically strong performance in State Legislatures and Congress. There appears to be no significant impact between the first election of their candidate and their reelection.

All of the evidence from both Presidential and state races I have looked at supports this conclusion.

We should replicate our results in 2024.

References

New York  Times 2020 exit polls

Wikipedia for election results

2004 exit polls
2008 Exit polls
2012 exit polls

Why the Electoral College Exists

There are a lot of different claims about why the Electoral College exists here in the United States. The arguments from Wikipedia from supporters states:

Supporters argue that it is a fundamental component of American federalism. They maintain the system elected the winner of the nationwide popular vote in over 90% of presidential elections; promotes political stability; preserves the Constitutional role of the states in presidential elections; and fosters a broad-based, enduring, and generally moderate political party system.

I’m going to go down these arguments one by one.

Over 90% accuracy

This is true, it rarely skews from the winner of the popular vote.

Promotes Political Stability

That must be why we had massive political protests after the 2016 election and why after losing the popular vote President Bush signed into law the PATRIOT ACT, effectively suspending parts of the Constitution through a vague unachievable goal in a war we will never win. Stability doesn’t mean good. It also doesn’t promote more stability compared to other democracies.

Constitutional role of the states in presidential elections

This is a deontological argument. There has been a long standing thread in American politics which argues that states needs rights. Who controls the states? Historically the rich and powerful who are more likely to be involved in state level politics, while most people ignore them.

Also, the Senate used to be elected by state legislatures, so the Constitutional role of states has fundamentally changed since our founding.

Fosters a broad-based, enduring and generally moderate political party system

There is nothing moderate about the PATRIOT ACT, which wouldn’t exist if we did not have the electoral college.

Forces candidates to look at less populated states

This is simply not the case if you look at where the money goes. Money and campaign visits get concentrated in the handful of states which are most likely going to tip. States like California, New York, Wyoming, and North Dakota are always ignored. Even Maine and New Hampshire despite being swing states barely get any campaign visits.

If Joe Biden wins both North Carolina and Florida on Tuesday, he could win without winning a single state which has fewer than 10 electoral college votes.


Click the map to create your own at 270toWin.com

The Electoral College makes small states irrelevant for the Presidency.

The Horrible Truth

So, if those arguments are not the reason for the electoral college, we have to start by outlining why we have the system we do today and understand the two basic ways heads of government are generally selected.

Democracies generally fit into one of two camps when it comes to the selection of their head of government. You are generally either a Presidential democracy where the head of government is elected by the people, or you are a Parliamentary or Semi-Presidential democracy where the head of government is selected by the parliament. Presidential democracies dominate in the Americas, Parliamentary and Semi-Presidential systems dominate in Europe.

America is a unique Presidential democracy in how we have the electoral college between the people and the President.

When our country was founded, 17.8% of the population was enslaved (according to the 1790 census). These slaves were concentrated in the south of course, with as many as 43% of South Carolina’s population being enslaved and 292,627 slaves in Virginia. The Founding Fathers needed to find a way to elect a head of government in a way which preserved slave power, and the Great Compromise.

Parliamentary democracies usually elect their head of government by a simple majority of one house of their parliament. This person is generally called a Prime Minister. Pretty simple.

But the United States is more complicated and relatively unusual because we have two coequal branches of our legislative body.  If only one branch of Congress elected the president, the coequality would be immediately thrown out of whack.

This led to several options. Having eligible voters do a direct vote could not work and still preserve slave power because it would undo the 3/5 compromise which entrenched slave power at the time. This preservation of slave power is why we do not elect our President directly

So, in order to preserve the delicate balance needed to prevent fracturing the country and having coequal branches the Electoral College was designed. Each state has a number of votes equal to its representation of congress which dilutes the power of cities and increases the power of slave owners, and those members vote for the President. A simple majority is required to elect a president and if no majority is achieved then the Senate selects the President and the House selects the Vice President (this system has been modified since our country was founded).

The main takeaway is that the Electoral College exists to protect slavery.

But notice that note… The electoral college has already been changed in how it works. Every state votes for the President now and the electors vote like the citizens of the state by custom. That by itself is not how the Electoral College worked in the beginning when State Legislatures decided how their electors would be determined.

We changed the Electoral College.

It was designed to preserve an institution which is now extinct.

We can abolish the Electoral College as soon as we recognize as a nation the evil reason why it existed in the first place.

Slavery will never be truly extinct as long as the Electoral College survives.

2020 Elections to watch

Here are the races I am watching this year:

  1. Federal

1.1. Executive

  • The Presidential election, because duh.
    • If Biden wins Arizona and Florida tonight, he is all but guaranteed to win the presidency.

1.2. Senate

  • Alabama, likely Republican pickup
  • Arizona
  • Colorado
  • Georgia
  • Iowa
  • Maine
  • North Carolina

1.3 House

2. State

2.1. Governors

  • Montana, Mike Cooney
    • Extremely tight race which could go either way

2.2. State Legislatures

  • Arizona House, 31-29 Republican
  • Arizona Senate,  17-13 Republican
  • Minnesota Senate, 35-32 Republican

 

The United States Constitution

If you go look at history in other countries, you find that in Parliamentary democracies they have failed whenever a far right government came into power.

Germany in 1933 is the most famous example, but similar systems in Spain led to Franco, and the United Kingdom’s election led to Brexit, which is threatening the country’s existence if Scottish Independence happens.

Parliamentary democracies and Presidential alike have a habit of becoming better over time. This is very clear on every freedom index in the world.But if you look at history, no Presidential democracy which has stood for 20 years has ever failed.

The Trump Presidency was the biggest threat to America’s democracy we have ever faced. The Republican Party gerrymandered, cheated, and rigged their way into power, but today on the day before the most important election of our country’s history, a Federal Court blocked a Republican attempt to prevent hundreds of thousands of Americans from having their vote count.

America might not be perfect, and there are many issues facing our country today. But EVERY Parliamentary Democracy in the world which has seen someone half as bad as Trump has fallen quickly without exception.

The United States combination of limited Federalism, Constitutionalism, and Courts has prevented us from falling to fascism like my family saw 87 years ago. Our system of government has proven time and time again to be possible to improve for the long term and damn near impossible to make worse except for small blips in history.

Even with a trifecta, the only thing Donald Trump was able to pass in law was tax reform.

Everything else he has done can be reversed in just 79 days.

I am a strong supporter of Constitutionalism, limited Federalism, and separation of powers. I believe strongly in Public Juries. The Bill of Rights of the United States is the greatest human rights document in the history of the world, and we are about to enter a great era of American History.

If we play our cards right we can make a lot of good this decade.

We are going to get a trifecta and we are going  to see major health care reform which is going to reduce the cost of drugs and end the number of Americans who are uninsured.

We are going to get a national carbon tax.

We are going to strike down every illegal voter discrimination law in the country before the next Presidential election.

We are going to end police brutality and proclaim that Black Lives Matter.

We are going to decriminalize drug use.

AMTRAK will be refurbished.

We will break up monopolies and nationalize natural monopolies.

We will defend the Bill of Rights and end unwarranted surveillance of Americans.

We will enact the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact before 5 November 2024.

We will make this country better.

We will proclaim that the United States is a nation not of rule of man, but the rule of law, and Donald Trump is going to be tried for his gross crimes and misdemeanors.

Tomorrow is the day where we reclaim our country and enter a great era of prosperity and greater equality than our country has ever known.

America is going to reclaim our natural place as the leader of the free world tomorrow.

The rest of the world awaits our election results.

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/02/930365888/federal-judge-dismisses-effort-to-throw-out-drive-through-votes-in-houston

The Future of Social Security

If you don’t know how OASI works, please read my first article in this series, How Social Security Works.

It should be common knowledge by now that Social Security has a massive surplus. This money is borrowed by the government as one of the largest parts of our government debt, accounting for over $2 trillion and is paid an interest rate which is about the same as inflation.

This happens because the Federal Government has received more money than it has paid out to retirees over the last 40 years due to the technology revolution we are in.

This is not going to last. Social Security will soon get as much from tax revenue as it pays out to retirees due to being an aging country, and it will never run a surplus again. The surplus in 2020 was only $2 billion, or $6 per person.

The Social Security Trust Fund is going to be fully depleted by 2037 unless we make some really drastic changes.

I don’t plan on retiring (unless if I get very lucky) until 2057.

As you see, this is a problem.

There are realistically 7 ways we can solve this problem, and I am going to go through the pros and cons of each.

Raise taxes

The easiest way to solve this problem without changing the way Social Security works is to raise taxes.

We can remove the cap on Social Security Wages, but this will be impossible to do politically because only 15% of the taxes you pay on income above $75,000 annual income counts for benefits. It also won’t solve the problem. Have fun.

We can increase taxes on the middle class. The problem is that someone who makes $50,000 per year is already paying an effective tax rate of 12.8% for retirement benefits which only add up to 25% of their salary, which is not enough to live on.  Increasing taxes on the median household, without increasing their benefits, for a program which already doesn’t pay enough for them to survive in retirement to a level which will save our current system is political Kryptonite.

Have fun.

Adjust spending

We can move Federal Spending from other places!

You can try to convince Republicans to switch money from the Department of Defense to pay for OASI. Have fun.

Or we can move money from Medicare/Medicaid and education assistance to pay for a program which only pays for 1/4 of people’s pre-retirement income.

Have fun with that.

Issue more bonds

Since the United States has its own currency we can just issue more Federal Debt to cover the Social Security system. This could have major impacts on the value of the United States Dollar given the scope of the problem. It’s not a wise solution.

The other option would mean higher taxes for Millennials when we are older, defeating the purpose. Paying higher taxes in the future to cover a program which is designed for our retirement but doesn’t pay enough to cover basic living expenses.

Have fun with that.

Reduce benefits

We can gradually reduce benefits on retirees until benefits are almost nothing. This will be the biggest fuck you to Millennials imaginable. Any politician who makes a real attempt to do this to a point where it will actually help will be voted out by my generation for ruining our future.

This is not possible to do.

Superannuation

We can allow people to get out of the system and give people the option to do a system like Australia or Singapore. Australians are the richest people in the world with their current system. This will mean that Millennials will get something for retirement, and not have to pay tax rates of 15% or 20% of our income (which will cut into our ability to save for retirement) to only get a retirement income which will be barely enough to pay our property tax or rent without covering our food. It will also mean fewer of us will need forms of welfare in retirement, saving a significant amount of money for state governments.

This could actually work.

Republicans sometimes talk about this solution, and have done it for decades. But even though they had opportunities to do this from 2003-2007 and from 2017-2019 they have never proposed a serious solution to it, instead giving massive tax breaks to millionaires as a precursor to defund investments in the United States. They have never been serious about this solution.

Foreign Workers

Have fun convincing Republicans to have hordes of foreign workers coming into the United States to save welfare.

As soon as Republicans get power again, this program will end, meaning it won’t save the current system.

Invest the Social Security Trust Fund

We can invest the Social Security Trust Fund into municipal bonds and the stock market so it can grow. This will at least postpone the point where we have to make more decisions in order to allow millennials to retire comfortably.

If we did this 30 years ago, this post would never have been written, and we could cancel the payroll tax today and pay out the beneficiaries for today’s seniors without ever touching the general fund.

Unfortunately neither party is serious about actually protecting the retirement of Americans given their actions. If your employer doesn’t offer a 401k you are more or less on your own. You can choose to do a tax deferred IRA, which is a lot better than nothing, but will force you to work until you are 65 unless you make enough money to have another fund on top of that to save for early retirement or work in one of a few professions like fire fighters who can retire at 55.

It still doesn’t address the issue of how OASI only pays for 25% of pre-retirement income however, and just maintains the current system where many Social Security retirees need  welfare in order to survive.

 

Millennials like myself need to know that when we turn 65 we will be able to retire comfortably.

The longer we wait to solve this problem, the more expensive it will be.

We need a solution.

We need it soon.

Vote for Joe

I cast my primary vote for Elizabeth Warren because I believe she had the best combination of strategy and progressive ideals, significantly more than any other candidate in the race. I voted for her despite her not really having a chance of winning because I wanted her to have as much influence at forming the platform as possible.

Because I believe in progressive ideals I am going to vote for Joe Biden. He probably would have been the  third or fourth candidate if I had been able to rank the primary, but we are looking at a situation where over 200,000 Americans have died from an epidemic we could have prevented, Trump coddles dictators, insults liberal leaders around the world, empowers domestic terrorists who threaten our civil servants, and he almost took healthcare away from millions of Americans. He has quite literally been endorsed by the Taliban.

I am going to vote for as many progressives on the ballot as I can, and I am going to vote for the man who is endorsed by Noam Chomsky, Julia Gillard, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and practically every non-fascist organization and public figure in the United States and the world.

I am going to vote for the man who has fought for mass transit for half a century, authored the Violence Against Women’s Act, and against all odds as Vice President passed the largest health care reform in the history of the United States.

I am going to vote for Joe Biden, and I hope you will as well.

Rule of Man

This is a short post because this is an extremely simply issue.

We have finally received extremely rudimentary details on Trump’s taxes from a leak given to the New York Times. They have not released or leaked the full tax returns yet.

The tax returns claim that Trump gave his daughter Ivanka over $700,000 in consulting “fees”. These fees should have been taxed as income when she received them if she received them as a sole proprietor, or they should have been taxed under Federal Corporation Tax if she received them under a corporation of any type.

A former Federal Prosecutor has claimed that this leak has enough details to give probable cause of a gross crime being committed, and if Trump has indeed committed a gross crime, that is an impeachable offense under the Constitution of the United States.

Senators Murray and Cantwell, Representative Denny Heck, Speaker Pelosi, you are my representatives in the United States Congress and the third person in to the Presidency. It is your constitutional duty to create a Congressional tribunal to get Trump’s taxes since he probably committed a gross crime, and if he has indeed committed a gross crime, it is your Constitutional duty to start a Congressional hearing into the taxes of Donald J. Trump and if he has indeed broken United States law, you have no choice but to impeach him.

If you do not, than we no longer have rule of law.

It’s just that simple.

May Justice Live Forever

The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg yesterday is an event which will significantly impact the future of American politics for the rest of our history.  The Roberts Court has seen multiple 5-4 decisions which have been extremely decisive for the future of our country. The timing of this vacancy just before an election which will certainly be historic as well as extremely significant, and there is precedence of courts interfering with elections with Bush v. Gore and numerous cases about voter discrimination over the last 10 years such as Shelby County v. Holder which required the revision of states which required preclearance under the Voting Rights Act.

Composition of the Supreme Court

There are currently 3 remaining liberal justices and 5 conservative justices on the Supreme Court. John Roberts has become the decisive swing vote after Anthony Kennedy’s resignation two years ago, and Kavanaugh and Gorsuch have been more moderate than I expected, but they are definitely on the conservative side of the court. Fivethirtyeight has good research on this issue.

A majority of justices on the Supreme Court have been appointed by Republicans since 1969 when Richard Nixon appointed Warren Burger and Harry Blackmun. This chart makes it very clear why we have so many 5-4 decisions right now in the Supreme Court, and how close we came to having a majority of Supreme Court justices being appointed by Democrats in 2016, the first time that could have happened without expanding the court since 1968.

Issues I anticipate will get attention

The Supreme Court will have cases on a very wide variety of issues over the next decade, just like every other decade in American history. Particularly I am concerned about their current desire to stop abortion, the possibility they will bring gay marriage back up, and the absolute guarantee that they will rule that the Affordable Care Act does not follow the commerce clause and is unconstitutional. They will invalidate voting rights laws, and defend gerrymandering. This will solidify Republican power and they will defend it.

This is a guarantee given the results of Rucho v. Common Cause.

They are not going to be moderate, and they are not going to play nice like Nancy Pelosi.

The 2 Rules of Republican Party Politics

The Republicans are not being contradictory in appointing another Supreme Court justice, but if you think it is contradictory that is because you are looking at it from a justice lens, as most Democrats have a destructive habit of doing. We expect everybody looks through the world with our own philosophy, which is damaging to society. The Republicans did not appoint Merrick Garland because it would have set them back decades in their crusade against voting rights, women’s rights, and concentrating power further in the hands of the (on average) old white men who bankroll their party. We see this with decisions to limit access to voting, but only in majority minority precincts, their crusade against birth control which is part of their very obvious quest to turn America into a plutocratic theocracy, and their adherence to Objectivism as proposed by Ayn Rand. The Republican mindset follows two rules:

  1. Might makes right.
  2. If people are not doing well, than that is a moral failure and it is their own fault.

That’s really all there is to it. You can fit every Republican policy into one of these two axioms.

The Republicans have complete power today. They control the Senate and the Presidency. They have the power to appoint a Supreme Court Justice, and because they believe might makes right, they are going to use it and we will have 6 Republican appointed justices on the Supreme Court.

Options going forward

I am expecting that we will live in a Republican dominated Supreme Court for a while. I highly doubt the Democrats are actually going to pack the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has been stable at 9 justices since 1940, and even though the stakes of the Court were particularly high in 2010 following Citizens United v. FEC Democratic Party leadership under President Obama, Chairman Kaine, and Speaker Pelosi was absolutely unwilling to modify the filibuster to pass the public option.

The Democrats have sat by and watched as States have passed many illegal voter discrimination laws, choosing not to bring them to court when there was a chance that they could have been overturned by the Supreme Court. This cost them the 2016 election. Since RBG died yesterday, it has also cost them the Supreme Court for the foreseeable future.

This is the party which stood by as a majority of state legislatures were gerrymandered, as a majority of states passed restrictive illegal voting laws, as they gave employers the ability to enforce their own religious beliefs on their employee’s health options, and now are committing crimes against humanity in our immigration prisons as a gift from mainstream respectable “play nice” Democrats.

A LOT of people are now saying that the Democrats are going to do an about face and increase the Supreme Court to 10 or 11 seats when Joe Biden becomes President and get the first liberal majority in 52 years.

It is not impossible, but given the level of voter disenfranchisement in our country today, I think it is extremely unlikely that the Democrats will change their losing strategy of the last 50 years.

There are now two probable options for the election this November:

  1. Donald Trump wins the Electoral College like he did in 2016.
  2. There is a long drawn out series of court battles if Joe Biden wins.

Those are our options.

This is why I voted for Elizabeth Warren in the primary. I believe her pragmatic progressivism would have brought states to court for violating Federal law, and led us towards an America where we could see real progress.

Instead we will have Joe Biden who was Vice President during the 6 years where Democrats controlled the Department of Justice and chose not to bring states to court as they violated Federal law in passing voter discrimination laws.

I am still voting for Joe Biden, and you should too. I would rather have a strategy free spineless wimp who wants everyone to play nice than someone who aspires to be a dictator. I highly HIGHLY doubt that he is going to do his Constitutional duty and uphold the Constitution of the United States by bringing states to court under the precedence of McCulloch v. Maryland, because that is what he did as Vice President.

Our only realistic option is to keep the Presidency for the next twenty years until both Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have passed away, and then we can have a 5-4 court.

I want to be wrong.

But I wasn’t wrong about global warming.

I wasn’t wrong about carbon taxes.

I wasn’t wrong that the probability of one liberal justice would die before 2021.

I wasn’t wrong that Trump would play dirty.

I was not wrong that #jillnothill gave the Republicans 6 seats on the Supreme Court.

I want to be wrong.

Joe Biden, please break your precedent and prove me wrong.

Democratic vs Republican Trifectas

Does your vote matter? Aren’t the parties the same? Does Democracy work?

Let’s investigate this.

I’m going to start the clock in 1933. There are a few reasons for this. The biggest reason is that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt pushed the Democratic Party towards its modern platform significantly. It would take another 62 years for the party factions to really be finalized for reasons we will get to.

First Democratic Trifecta under Roosevelt, 1933-1947 (1-14)

  • New Deal
  • Social Security
  • Justices who would decide Brown v. Board of Education were nominated in this time period.

Second Democratic Trifecta under Truman, 1949-1953 (15-18)

  • Marshall Plan
  • Korean War
  • Racial integration of military and federal agencies
  • 2 Justices who would late decide Brown v. Board

First Republican Trifecta under Eisenhower, 1953-1955 (1-2)

  • Nuclear proliferation
  • Interstate Highways
  • McCarthyism
  • Earl Warren who presided over Brown v. Board of Education

Third Democratic Trifecta under Kennedy and Johnson, 1961-1969 (19-26)

  • Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • Voting Rights Act
  • Civil Rights Act of 1968

Fourth Democratic Trifecta under Carter, 1977-1981 (27-31)

  • Camp David Accords
  • Panama Canal Treaties
  • Continued Stagflation

Fifth Democratic Trifecta under Clinton, 1993-1995 (32-33)

  • Motor Voter
  • Don’t Ask Don’t Tell (improvement over what came before)
  • Brady Handgun Violence
  • NAFTA
  • Violence Against Women Act
  • Federal Assault Weapons Ban

Second Republican Trifecta under Bush, 2003-2007 (3-6)

  • Iraq War
  • Partial birth abortion ban
  • Laci and Conner’s Law
  • Central American Free Trade Agreement
  • PATRIOT ACT Improvement and Reauthorization Act
  • Tax cuts

Sixth Democratic Trifecta under Obama, 2009-2011 (34-35)

  • Affordable Care Act
  • Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
  • Dodd-Frank
  • Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal
  • Increase Pell Grant
  • Students borrow directly from the government
  • Easier access to student loans

Third Republican Trifecta, 2017-2019 (7-8)

  • Tax reform

When we look at the history of the 9 trifectas we can see that when Democrats tend to pass laws which target access to health care, reducing inequality, and fighting racism when they have trifectas. Republicans have only had a couple, where they tend to increase militarization, start wars, and cut taxes for the wealthy.

I believe these are all major issues.

History teaches us there is a very big difference between the parties.

Remember to vote in November.